Recent events in Saanich show how strong community voices can influence change. Two key developments—the rejection of a $150 million operations centre plan and the halt on the McKenzie-Quadra development—stand as examples of active public involvement. These outcomes weren’t just protests. They were signs that people want to take part in shaping their city.
But beneath the success of these campaigns lies a missed chance. Local leaders and advocacy groups could have had deeper conversations before tensions rose. Instead of waiting for backlash, earlier, open talks might have led to better solutions. The silence before the storm was the real loss.
One thing is clear: the community is not against growth or progress. Groups like Save Our Saanich are asking for something simple—respectful, two-way dialogue. They want to be heard, not ignored. Their efforts are not about saying “no” to development. They’re asking leaders to see them as partners, not opponents.
The power of difficult conversations is often overlooked. Talking about hard issues can feel risky. Many avoid them out of fear it might lead to conflict. But those tough discussions are where real progress can happen. When people open up with honesty and respect, it becomes easier to find common ground. These talks help uncover hidden worries, question assumptions, and bring people together.
Research shows that trust grows when leaders engage early and often, not only after a plan is released. Good communication doesn’t start with a public hearing. It begins long before that—with regular contact and space for real dialogue. A shift is needed. Instead of using old-style consultation models, leaders should invite people to be part of shaping ideas from the start.
Creating this kind of co-working process is not easy. It takes bravery from both citizens and officials. But the rewards are worth it. Communities grow stronger when people feel they matter. When their voices shape plans, not just respond to them, trust deepens.
The lessons from Saanich are clear. Public input can improve decisions. But to get the most out of that input, leaders must be willing to engage earlier. They must be open to tough, sometimes uncomfortable conversations. These are not moments to avoid—they are chances to build stronger ties.
Saanich now stands at a crossroads. With more proposed changes likely in the future, there’s time to improve how decisions are made. Leaders can choose to meet citizens with openness, invite honest input, and build together. Or they can keep following outdated paths that lead to pushback and delays.
True community engagement means more than checking boxes. It means trust, time, and a shared vision. People are ready to join the work. What’s needed is a system that brings them in—before decisions are finalized, not after they fall apart.
The recent pauses and rejections may feel like setbacks, but they’re also signs of hope. They show people care deeply and are willing to act. With better communication and early connection, these efforts can become the foundation for better, shared outcomes.
